Text

40 Days Of Truth: Day 2

ladyatheist:

Emergency contraception does not cause abortion.

The “pro-life” movement loves to claim that emergency contraception causes abortion. This is simply not true. It is used to prevent a pregnancy from happening; it does not terminate an existing pregnancy. There are four different types of emergency contraception pills available around the world. If you want to know what types are available in your country click here.

Emergency contraception is also referred to as the “morning after pill”, but you don’t have to wait until the morning after to take it. It can be taken right after sex or up to five days after and still be effective. Keep in mind that the sooner you take it the more effective it is.

If you would like more information about emergency contraception, check out these links:

(Source: brashblacknonbeliever, via bebinn)

Text

Today marks the first day of 40 days for life.

bebinn:

ladyatheist:

For the next 40 days, “pro-lifers” will be standing outside of abortion clinics around the country and the world praying, yelling, and harassing those who dare go inside. I, for one, will not stand for this. Unfortunately, I am not able to be part of or help stage a counter protest at a clinic. I’m moving in 6 days so my hands are kind of full.

However, what I can do is stage my own little counter protest online. From now until November 1st, I will be blogging about one fact about abortion. While they spread hate and lies I will spread a little truth.

I can’t do this alone. I’m just one tiny voice going up against thousands. In order to make a real impact, I’m going to need your help. If you have time, take a few minutes out of your day and send a tweet or write about one abortion fact. If you have a little more time to spare, find a way to take action. If you have a bit of money to spare, take some time to donate to Planned Parenthood. Every little bit helps.

So glad someone’s doing this.

 If you’re in the Seattle area, we are planning on having three counter protests, two in Seattle and one in Everett. Facebook events are:

Join us! Fight for your rights!

(Source: brashblacknonbeliever)

Text

40 Days Of Truth: Day 1

bebinn:

ladyatheist:

Abortion does not cause breast cancer.

From the National Cancer Institute:

The relationship between induced and spontaneous abortion and breast cancer risk has been the subject of extensive research beginning in the late 1950s. Until the mid-1990s, the evidence was inconsistent. Findings from some studies suggested there was no increase in risk of breast cancer among women who had had an abortion, while findings from other studies suggested there was an increased risk. Most of these studies, however, were flawed in a number of ways that can lead to unreliable results. Only a small number of women were included in many of these studies, and for most, the data were collected only after breast cancer had been diagnosed, and women’s histories of miscarriage and abortion were based on their “self-report” rather than on their medical records. Since then, better-designed studies have been conducted. These newer studies examined large numbers of women, collected data before breast cancer was found, and gathered medical history information from medical records rather than simply from self-reports, thereby generating more reliable findings. The newer studies consistently showed no association between induced and spontaneous abortions and breast cancer risk.

It really doesn’t get much clearer than that. Yes, there were studies in the past that said induced abortion and breast cancer were linked. However, those studies were proven to be false. To continue to cite them does not make the “abortion causes breast cancer” myth true. It only shows that the “pro-life” movement only cares about scaring people out of getting the abortion they want and need. Anyone who says that abortion causes breast cancer is flat out lying.

If you want more information on the topic, here are some links to check out:

For more studies on the topic:

This reanalysis of 53 studies on the correlation between abortion and breast cancer, published in the Lancet in 2004 and cited on the National Institute of Health’s PubMed database, concluding that there is no link.

National Cancer Institute’s Early Reproductive Events and Breast Cancer Workshop that concluded, in 2003, that there was also no link.

American Cancer Society’s page on abortion and breast cancer, which states that - surprise! - there’s no link.

1997 study of 1.5 million Danish women that concludes there’s no link.

Just for quick reference.

(Source: brashblacknonbeliever)

Quote
"Ninety-seven percent of OB-GYNs have encountered patients wanting an abortion, but only 14 percent of the doctors perform them, according to a study published today in the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology."

— Bad news for abortion access. Via NPR. (via iamdrtiller)

(Source: stephherold, via bebinn)

Quote
"It’s like women can’t be trusted to do anything right outside of the kitchen, including make their own decisions about their bodies."

Reproductive rights, not women, need protecting - Perspectives - Arizona Daily Wildcat - The University Of Arizona (via charliemielczarek)

(via charliemielczarek)

Link

fuckyeahplannedparenthood:

One reader of Concord Monitor responds to this letter in which a crisis pregnancy center (Care Net Center) is defended as being the “alternative” to Planned Parenthood, although it provides none of the same essential health services.


“Re “An alternative” (Monitor letter, Aug. 18): Jim Preisendorfer’s letter states that CareNet centers can provide all the services that Planned Parenthood provides, other than contraception and abortion.

He is incorrect. CareNet can provide none of the services that Planned Parenthood does, other than referral, since CareNet is not a medical office staffed with doctors and ARNPs. Planned Parenthood is.

CareNet cannot provide a woman’s annual physical examination, provide screening for breast and cervical cancer, give a woman a pelvic examination, examine her cervix for disease, scrape cells and send them in for the pap test. CareNet cannot draw blood and test for sexually transmitted diseases, strep throat, thyroid dysfunction, diabetes, or any other standard medical testing. CareNet cannot provide a pregnant woman with prenatal medical care, prescribe necessary medications for her, or monitor the health of her fetus. CareNet cannot provide a woman and her husband with infertility services or with contraception. CareNet cannot put anyone, man or woman, on the appropriate antibiotics for an infection.

These are the services that Planned Parenthood provides throughout the United States and the world. Planned Parenthood is the largest provider of these services in the United States. These are 97 percent of the services that Planned Parenthood provides, free or on a sliding scale. Planned Parenthood is the only medical provider many women see.

Planned Parenthood also will provide counseling for women faced with an unplanned pregnancy, discussing social services available, medical services available, adoption, and where legal abortions can be obtained - which in most places is not at Planned Parenthood, since most Planned Parenthood facilities do not provide abortion. Only 3 percent of Planned Parenthood visits are abortion services.”

This is why CPCs should be required to actually state what services they offer. If we just rely on the notion that they are an “alternative” or basically Planned Parenthood minus abortions, we give them a LOT more credit than they deserve. They are not medical facilities, and they shouldn’t be masquerading as such.

Quote
"If someone wants an abortion, they will get an abortion. The only difference is whether they can have it performed in a safe medical environment, or whether they’re going to end up swallowing bleach or using a coat hanger."

stfuconservatives (via somethingvagueandteapots)

(Source: deartuate)

Link

keepyourboehneroutofmyuterus:

Abortion funds are groups of people who help women pay for their abortions. 

Nearly all abortion funds are grassroots organizations that work directly with women and families who face obstacles to abortion. Funds help women to pay for an abortion and for travel to a clinic or for an overnight stay in a motel near a clinic. Some funds provide a place to stay in their own homes for women who have to travel a great distance. Many funds also help women to pay for contraception and the morning after pill.

Abortion funds are often women’s only allies as they try to raise money to pay for an abortion.

They are also at the forefront of a dynamic and growing movement that honors the leadership and voices of low-income women, young women, and women of color.

I imagine that abortion funds are willing to help any person who is in need of abortion care.

(Source: keepyourbsoutofmyuterus, via fuckyeahplannedparenthood)

Text

fuckyeahplannedparenthood:

Judge J. Thomas Marten Will Not Suspend Order, Protecting Kansas Planned Parenthood

I wanted the title to say “Judge J. Thomas Martin: Kicking Ass and Taking Names” but I wasn’t sure if that was appropriate.

“U.S. District Judge J. Thomas Marten, in Wichita, rejected a request from the state to stay his Aug. 1 order until the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver decides whether to overturn it. Marten’s latest order was issued Wednesday.

Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri filed a lawsuit over a provision in the current state budget that prevents the group from obtaining federal dollars for family planning. Planned Parenthood expected to lose about $330,000.

Peter Brownlie, the Planned Parenthood chapter’s president and chief executive officer, said Marten’s decision isn’t surprising and said it suggests the state isn’t likely to succeed with its appeal.

“The judge’s decision was quite emphatic,” Brownlie said of Marten’s first order.

The budget provision was among several major anti-abortion initiatives approved by legislators this year and signed by Brownback, a Republican who publicly called upon lawmakers to create “a culture of life.”

The state’s two abortion providers other than Planned Parenthood are involved in their own federal lawsuit over new regulations specifically for hospitals, clinics and doctor’s offices performing five or more elective abortions a month. And this week, the American Civil Liberties Union sued to block a new law restricting private insurance coverage of elective abortions.

Brownback defended the anti-abortion measures Thursday, noting they won legislative approval with large, bipartisan majorities.

“You can’t know for sure what all comes out of that afterwards, but it was the will of the Legislature and the people of the state of Kansas,” he told reporters.

The budget provision requires the state to distribute federal family planning dollars first to public health departments and hospitals. The Kansas Department of Health and Environment committed most of the money that had been going to Planned Parenthood to Sedgwick County’s health department.

The provision doesn’t mention Planned Parenthood by name, but lawmakers who backed it said repeatedly that they were trying to “defund” the group. They argued that taxpayers shouldn’t indirectly subsidize abortions, though none of the funds can be used directly for such services.

Planned Parenthood argues in its lawsuit that the provision violates its rights to free speech and due legal process, and it is being punished for advocating abortion rights.

Planned Parenthood performs abortions at a clinic in the Kansas City suburb of Overland Park, but it provides other services there and at clinics in Wichita and Hays.

Marten said in his latest decision that keeping his order in effect would do little harm to the state, while suspending it “will work irreparable injury” to Planned Parenthood.” 

“Culture of Life?” While that phrase is completely nonsensical it’s also quite disturbing. Excuse me, Senator Brownback, you are hoping for a culture of denying people their right to access basic healthcare? For a culture that places more worth on a bundle of cells inside of a uterus than on the person who owns said uterus? A culture built on a foundation of fear-mongering, lies, misogyny, slut-shaming, punishment of the poor, and the erasure of trans* people? A culture that is willing to let people die because they could not access a legal abortion? That does not sound at all like a culture that promotes life, Senator. That is a culture that harms us all.

Link

prochoicejacksonville:

bebinn:

prolifehypocrisy:

A bill in Michigan seeks to fine anyone who tries to coerce or pressure anyone into having an abortion. That’s okay. In fact, it’s great. On the surface. But think about it in the larger context. This law does not seek to punish or discourage anyone who tries to force someone not to get an abortion. This is not about protecting choice. This is about further stigmatizing and demonizing abortion.

It’s outright hypocrisy and it gets even worse:

And to take the hypocrisy even further, Michigan happens to be a state with strict parental notification laws for minors seeking abortion. So while it could soon become illegal for parents to attempt to pressure their daughters into having abortions, it is well within parents’ legal rights to force their daughters to continue an unwanted pregnancy. This type of tactic seems to be a hot trend right now in anti-choice legislation: nationwide, we’ve seen proposed laws claiming to provide women with greater ability to make informed decisions, to ensure increased safety of clinics, to prevent abortions due to the race or gender of the fetus. They are the kind of laws that sound almost inarguable, unless we look at them in a larger context. When one specific action or procedure is the subject of intense legal scrutiny, that scrutiny reflects a bias.

Emphasis added because that is flat-out horrible. And absolutely hypocritical.

You can’t just say that pressuring someone to have an abortion is wrong but that outright forcing them to have a baby is okay.

Don’t think for a second any of these bills requiring extra ultrasounds, biased counseling and stricter clinic regulations are to protect people who want abortions. They are all about making it more difficult to access abortions, no matter the cost. Anti-choicers who think otherwise are, at best, deluding themselves, and at worst, completely disingenuous.

^

Being pro-choice means allowing someone to make their own reproductive decisions, period.

(via riotgrrrljacksonville-deactivat)